DAO Treasury AUM: $24.6B ▲ +18% YoY | Governance Proposals: 4,200/mo ▲ Cross-protocol | Protocol Votes Cast: 1.8M ▲ Mar 2026 | Institutional Funds: 147 ▲ Tokenized | Basel III Exposure: 2% Cap ▼ Group 2 Assets | PoR Adopters: 34 Exchanges ▲ +12 in 2025 | Smart Contract Audits: 2,800 ▲ 2026 YTD | Gov Token Mkt Cap: $18.3B ▲ +22% YoY | DAO Treasury AUM: $24.6B ▲ +18% YoY | Governance Proposals: 4,200/mo ▲ Cross-protocol | Protocol Votes Cast: 1.8M ▲ Mar 2026 | Institutional Funds: 147 ▲ Tokenized | Basel III Exposure: 2% Cap ▼ Group 2 Assets | PoR Adopters: 34 Exchanges ▲ +12 in 2025 | Smart Contract Audits: 2,800 ▲ 2026 YTD | Gov Token Mkt Cap: $18.3B ▲ +22% YoY |

DAO Governance Tracker

Monitor governance health, treasury status, and proposal activity across the most significant DAOs in the ecosystem. Data sourced from DeepDAO, Dune Analytics, and Messari. Updated quarterly.


Top DAOs by Treasury Size — Q1 2026

DAOTreasury ValueGovernance TokenParticipation RateProposals (Q1)Legal Entity
Uniswap$6.8BUNI4.2%12Uniswap Foundation (Cayman)
MakerDAO/Sky$5.2BMKR/SKY14.8%47Dai Foundation (Cayman)
Arbitrum$4.1BARB8.7%34Arbitrum Foundation (Cayman)
Optimism$3.8BOP11.2%28Optimism Foundation
Aave$2.9BAAVE9.4%42Aave Companies
Lido$2.4BLDO7.1%19Lido DAO (unincorporated)
ENS$1.8BENS15.3%8ENS Foundation (Cayman)
Compound$1.2BCOMP5.8%15Compound Labs
Gitcoin$890MGTC12.1%22Gitcoin Foundation
Curve$780MCRV6.4%31N/A

Governance Health Indicators

IndicatorEcosystem AverageTop QuartileBottom Quartile
Voter Participation Rate9.2%14.5%+<5%
Proposal Pass Rate72%85%+<60%
Average Voting Period5.2 days7+ days<3 days
Delegate Concentration (Top 10)64%<50%>75%
Time to Proposal Execution12.4 days8 days18+ days
Quorum Achievement Rate78%90%+<65%

Delegate Activity — Top Delegates by Voting Power (Cross-Protocol)

DelegatePrimary DAOsTotal Voting Power (USD equiv.)Participation RateVoting Rationale Published
a][Uniswap, Compound$420M98%Yes
StableLabAave, Arbitrum, Optimism$380M95%Yes
Flipside CryptoAave, Compound$290M92%Yes
Penn BlockchainMakerDAO, Compound$215M88%Yes
Michigan BlockchainGitcoin, Compound$180M91%Yes

Proposal Category Distribution — Q1 2026

Category% of ProposalsAvg. ParticipationPass Rate
Treasury/Funding34%11.2%68%
Risk Parameters22%8.4%82%
Protocol Upgrades15%12.8%71%
Governance Process12%9.6%74%
Partnerships/Integrations10%7.8%79%
Emergency/Security4%18.4%91%
Other3%6.2%65%
Legal StructureNumber of DAOsNotable Examples
Cayman Foundation34Uniswap, ENS, Arbitrum
Wyoming DAO LLC12Various smaller DAOs
Swiss Association8Protocol-focused DAOs
BVI Company7Fund-oriented DAOs
Panama Foundation5Privacy-focused DAOs
Marshall Islands DAO4Pioneering DAOs
Delaware LLC6US-focused DAOs
No Legal Entity71Curve, Lido, others

Governance Incident Log — Q1 2026

DateDAOIncident TypeDescriptionResolution
Jan 2026[Redacted]Governance AttackFlash loan voting attempt on treasury proposalProposal defeated; governance parameters tightened
Feb 2026[Redacted]Delegate ControversyMajor delegate voted against disclosed governance philosophyDelegation withdrawn by multiple delegators
Mar 2026[Redacted]Emergency ActionSecurity vulnerability required emergency parameter changeGuardian pause; governance ratification within 48 hours

Related Dashboards: Governance Market Data | Institutional Fund Comparison

Deep Dives: MakerDAO Governance Evolution | DAO Legal Entity Structures | DeFi Protocol Governance Mechanisms | DAO Governance Attack Vectors | DAO Treasury Management Framework | What Is a DAO

Institutional Access

Coming Soon